Change the font size
Contacts:
Å-mail: news@rosatom.ru
30 March 2010 year
— We should take into account that it was a combined initiative. There was an initiative of 2006 by President of the Russian Federation regarding the global nuclear power sector which implied establishment of international centers, and one more initiative of director of International Atomic Energy Agency on guaranteed supplies system. More
30 March 2010 year
— Undoubtedly, the signed agreement will interest the countries which are still going to develop their nuclear power industry and want to ensure to themselves the opportunity to purchase fuel for planned nuclear power plants. More
30 March 2010 year
— I appreciate the agreement signed with International Atomic Energy Agency for creation of security stock of low-enriched uranium for supply thereof for countries members of International Atomic Energy Agency as a very good achievement. More
30 March 2010 year
— Creation of global infrastructure of nuclear power industry is a Russian initiative, and consent of International Atomic Energy Agency is evidence of large international authority of Russian nuclear industry. More
30 March 2010 year
— «The agreement on creation of security stock of low-enriched uranium (LEU) signed with International Atomic Energy Agency for supplies of LEU to International Atomic Energy Agency is real contribution to non-proliferation. More
30 March 2010 year
— «The security stock of the nuclear fuel agreement on which was signed yesterday by Russia and International Atomic Energy Agency will become a sort of insurance for all the countries which want to develop their nuclear power sector but do not wish to assume any risks connected with non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. More
29 March 2010 year
— When we say that we are back to the nuclear energy, it’s a combination of those who wants to use the present nuclear energy stations and some people talk about new ones. 30 percent want to use present plans and 22 percent want to build a new ones. Only 8 percent wants to stop them in a short time. More
29 March 2010 year
— Vietnam does not cover its plans of development of nuclear power sector and construction of NPPs. I think they well understand that before construction of any nuclear objects it is necessary to learn how to do it. More
26 March 2010 year
— We are very glad at making of this contract. Finally, contract of continuing of construction of Tyanvan NPP in China is signed. More
26 March 2010 year
— Undoubtedly, our competitiveness at the world nuclear market after this signing will grow. I worry more about the matter – will we be able to build such number of nuclear power plants. More
26 March 2010 year
— «Our cooperation with China in the sphere of nuclear power sector proves that Russia progressively enters the Asian market. The evidence of that is also our developing relations with Vietnam, with Government of which agreement was signed about intentions of cooperation in the area of nuclear power industry. More
26 March 2010 year
— «I think that signing of the contract for construction of the second stage of Tyanvan NPP is logical continuation of successful cooperation of the two parties and the best proof of acknowledgement of efficiency and competitiveness of Atomstroyexport at such a big market as Chinese. More
26 March 2010 year
«Entering the Asian market is of principle importance, because China, as it is expected, will build about one third of all new commissioned power generation facilities in the world, that is why it is very important to occupy the largest possible share in it. More
26 March 2010 year
— «Market of China is very important for us both from point of view of energy sector and from point of view of electric power supplies, as well as strengthening at market of high-technology products. The fact that we entered with construction of our power units VVER – was undoubtedly a positive step. More
24 March 2010 year
«This plant could function without any modernizations minimum till 2020. and after modernization the operation life may be prolonged by 10–15 years, that is in the same way as it is prolonged for LGWR. More
24 March 2010 year
In this year Rosatom continues active work on development of competition among suppliers of the nuclear power sector. Active information position, as well as transparency of the orders system allows Rosatom to expect improvement of quality of goods and services provided for the nuclear power sector, as well as reduction of cost of such goods and services More
24 March 2010 year
From the point of view of counteraction to monopolism, we already have antimonopoly law for this, the respective service which controls this issue. And as for moving to some uniform standards, optimization of purchasing mode, engineering processes, assistance to some suppliers, integration, of course, such events are very important More
24 March 2010 year
People will sell for the price which they want, if no alternative will be present. And presence of competition will automatically make the pricing mechanism more transparent. I think, such events are effective in this plan, since any consideration and discussion of this issued is very useful More
24 March 2010 year
Strictly speaking, to be part of large-scale reform on increase of efficiency and market features of the State corporation, it is necessary for the suppliers to understand the essence of the reform, and for this purpose such meetings and forums are held as «Atomex» in Saint-Petersburg. «Atomex“ becomes especially urgent for suppliers of North-Western region within the period of construction in NWFD of Leningrad NPP-2, Baltic NPP, other objects of nuclear branch of the region, works on erection of which are being carried out at the present moment». More
24 March 2010 year
I think that it is continuing of the policy of transparency enhancement which is performed by Rosatom for several years, in the framework of which in the previous year unified purchasing center was established, the Unified purchasing standard was introduced. Due to introduction of the new purchasing system in 2009 on some purchases we managed to economize up to 75%, for the half year of the system functioning the economic effect exceeded 1 bln. rubles. At that for creation of the system itself 15 mln. rubles were spent. More
23 March 2010 year
— . Russia has great potential in entering into the Indian nuclear market where the international players are increasingly competing to get their share of pie. The agreement signed between India and Russia will deepen and strengthen the already existing nuclear cooperation between the two countries. This civil nuclear agreement will ensure uninterrupted fuel supply for Indian reactors More
23 March 2010 year
— At this point of time the most important issue, especially when it comes to the domestic politics in India, is the question of nuclear liability. Since Rosatom is a government owned enterprise, it does not require the enactment of a nuclear liability bill by India to operate in Indian nuclear industry market, unlike private players such as the US and Japanese companies. That makes Russian reactors particularly acceptable in the domestic scenario More
22 March 2010 year
«Normal startup is good. It is pleasant that it was done according to the plan, having kept the terms. In spite of the fact that now they are often shifted, not only in Russia, but also abroad. More
22 March 2010 year
Do not forget that at the world market at standard strict requirements to safety now the following two competitive advantages are appreciated most of all – the time and the price. Our potential is just colossal. Yes, now we should approach seriously to replacement of facilities, since we face serious deterioration in the entire energy sector. The latest statement of Vladimir Putin about that many countries have in their energy balance 70% (in France even 80%) of nuclear power sector is not just words. More
18 March 2010 year
— For Vietnam construction of NPP is now very urgent, because now mainly hydroelectric power plants work there, which are very unstable, since they depend on seasons. The main point is that our Eastern partners should find economic opportunities for this construction. At the same time, it is not a large country and industry is not so much developed there to make sense to build several NPPs at the same time More
17 March 2010 year
— This law does not contradict the foreign practice. It very clearly determines division of responsibility, it stipulates provision of financing, that is very important and without which any law becomes just a plain declaration. Responsibility of waste producers and those who accepts it, that is national operator, is set forth. Everything in this law is clearly ranged and expounded, and anyone can check up how it corresponds with the things really done More
16 March 2010 year
— Reasons there is, and still today, primarily the fact that the licensing process to build and operate takes a lot of time and hence, money. It becomes an economical question to apply for as many as blocks (or Megawatts) as reasonable possible for the particular site More
15 March 2010 year
— We see such trust of both countries to each other, and of course, it is a significant factor for such cooperation. Surely, one more important fact is that in general it is belief in Russian technologies, in Russia’s ability to provide modern construction technologies, to supply nuclear power plants with modern and reliable nuclear reactors and ensure maintenance of there nuclear reactors in the future More
12 March 2010 year
— Russia remains one of the leading players at Indian market that is confirmed by expected signing of agreement on construction on additional power units at NPP «Kudankulam» with participation of «Atomstroyexport», other agreements. It is for the next time confirms competitiveness of Russian technologies in the area of nuclear power industry More
11 March 2010 year
— I cannot agree with statements of some ecological organizations that the draft law about radioactive waste handling is not good because, they say, legislatively permits injection of liquid RAW underground. Indeed, the present legislation permits such injection. I would like to tell it in details More
09 March 2010 year
— The importance of adoption of federal law «About handing of radioactive waste» can scarcely be overestimated. This law is present in all countries which develop nuclear power sector, but till the present time we did not have it. We should specially note that without adoption of this law that regulates the issues of radioactive waste handling, development of nuclear power sector is impossible More
09 March 2010 year
— In my opinion, approval of the draft law will enable us to achieve solution of the main task – that is in certain time period the amount of buried waste in our country should exceed the amount of that new formed. It will allow to preclude the faulty practice of RAW accumulation without burial thereof. More
05 March 2010 year
— During making such polls, we found absolutely strict correlation between level of information amount and apprehension regarding nuclear power sector. The better and more complete information received by local population from the nuclear power branch is, the more positive is the attitude. According to the poll in Kaliningrad we see that atomists carried out good work More
05 March 2010 year
— I know that in the course of preparing to the second reading, many amendments were received in Duma regarding this draft law, that is quite natural during the period between the first and the second readings and considering apprehension of the society about this extremely important topic More
05 March 2010 year
— If speaking about essence of the draft law, to my opinion the main thing in it is legislatively guaranteed liability of RAW producers to pay for waste burial. Thus, understandable source of financing of all works related to waste treatment is established More
04 March 2010 year
— It is widely accepted in the world nuclear industry that the costs of waste management and disposal are internalised, that is, they are borne by the power producer /utility and built into the cost of electricity sold. There may then be an arrangement for the power producer to pay another, eg national, body to take over the management and disposal. More
04 March 2010 year
— Functioning of the new NPP will converse Kaliningrad region from region of middle and small business which it is now, into region of large-scale industry. I am sure that as a result the region will take leading positions in economic development. More
04 March 2010 year
— «Gazprom» carries out construction of Kaliningrad heat and power plant-2 in Kaliningrad region, and as expected, the plant will be ready for functioning by the end of 2010, whereas commissioning of the first power unit of the NPP is planned only by 2016. After commissioning of heat and power plant-2, as supposes expert of FNES, Kaliningrad region will be able to export electric power More
03 March 2010 year
— If competent explanatory work is carried out, as we see it in Kaliningrad region, the population can be persuaded in that they should not apprehend and there is nothing to be afraid of. The entire Europe lives side by side with those nuclear power plants and nothing happens. More
02 March 2010 year
— I would like to add the following. I studied objections of some ecological organizations which, in particular, allege that the draft law permits pumping of radioactive waste under ground. So, by the present day it is global practice. Actually all countries of the world which deal with RAW come to the conclusion that burial into deep geological disposal of RAW after processing is the only solution, and there are no other real variants yet More
02 March 2010 year
— I am sure that the law will allow the people resident in the territory of Tomsk region near the objects producing RAW to feel more quietly and confidently. The law will allow to provide strict control upon movement of each gram of RAW More
02 March 2010 year
— Moreover, execution of the draft law will provide formation of conditions for development of nuclear power branch of the Russian Federation and extension of export of Russian nuclear technologies, and also will enable to eliminate questions and doubts for benefit of deployment of nuclear objects in the regions More
02 March 2010 year
— Prospects of commercialization of the aforesaid technologies of fast neutron reactors depend on capacity of single power unit, demand of regions in power supply and availability of distribution networks. Extensiveness of Russia territory in general and Eastern regions in particular, with low population density in them do not need large single unit capacities. More