30 May 2010 year

Sergey Beiden, senior analyst of electric power industry of IFK Metropol

 — If we consider development of the electric power industry in the long term we will see the growth in Asian region which will be mainly provided by China and India and by fast-growing economies of relatively small countries, such as Vietnam. More

30 May 2010 year

Sergey Kondratiev, senior expert of the Foundation Institute for Energy and Finance

 — Rosatom’s success in Vietnam will allow Russia to get a foothold at the strategically important market of South East Asia as in recent years the countries of this region has shown a considerable interest in the nuclear power industry. More

28 May 2010 year

R.N. JAYARAJ, Chief Executive, Nuclear Fuel Complex, Department of Atomic Energy of India:

 — At the congress I would like to speak of our companies’ capabilities, what we manufacture and what will be our program in the future in joint cooperation with Russians. More

28 May 2010 year

Sergey Ryzhov, Director and General Designer of GIDROPRESS OJSC Development Design Office

 — Forum ATOMEXPO is the central congress and exhibition event in the nuclear industry. With respect to the global nuclear industry renaissance and the immensity of previous ATOMEXPO-2009, we expect the increase of interest to the Forum at least for the nearest future. More

27 May 2010 year

Ossi Koskivirta, Procurement Manager Nuclear Fuel Fortum Generation:

 — We have business contacts with many Russian companies and I think we have normal business activities with them. I hope to increase business and make some cooperation with Russian companies. More

26 May 2010 year

Oleg Saraev, Deputy General Director of Rosenergoatom Concern OJSC

 — Holding of the international forum “ATOMEXPO” has already become a tradition that makes it possible to introduce changes into habitual methods of work. More

26 May 2010 year

Igor Linge, Deputy Director of Nuclear Safety Institute (NSI RAS)

 — Holding of such forum as “ATOMEXPO” is important and necessary for development of the nuclear power engineering and industry. More

20 May 2010 year

Ekaterina Tripoten, analyst of IC «Sovlink»

 — «Result of this year, undoubtedly, overcomes that of the previous one. It is enough to compare number of lots and saving volume More

20 May 2010 year

Sergey Kondratyev, senior expert of Fund «Institute of economy and finance»

 — At that, total volume of bidding, as well as amount of saving achieved at the bidding, permanently grow – on results of the October fair, saving made 57 mln. rub. More

20 May 2010 year

Englen Azizov, director of Department of physics of tokamak-reactors (DPTR) of FSUE «GNC RF TRINITI», director of Institute of tokamaks physics of RSC «Kurchatov institute», Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, prof

 — Amount and complexity of equipment supplied by Russia speaks of that our domestic products of atomic industry has global meaning. And we have something to be proud of and what to show at ATOMEXPO. More

20 May 2010 year

Stanislav Martyushev, general director of CJSC «Interfax business service»

 — Really, we previously cooperated with Atomenergoprom and now suppose that cooperation with Rosatom will also be developed on subject area of interaction with investors. More

20 May 2010 year

Maxim Kozlov, head of project group «Baltic NPP», INTER RAO

 — Forum ATOMEXPO represents an excellent ground for communication, business contacts, establishing connections, and its is an important precondition for development of business More

13 May 2010 year

Nikolay Ponomarev-Stepnoy, vice-president of RSC KI, academician of RAS

 — Absence of 123 agreement actually gives us no opportunity to work and cooperate in the area of nuclear power industry. Because if some documents are just written and that is all – it is not cooperation. More

13 May 2010 year

Nikolay Kosarev, deputy chairman of committee of the FC on natural resources and environment protection, member of commission of the FC on natural monopolies

 — . In general, 123 Agreement opens large opportunities for mutually beneficial cooperation in Russian and American nuclear materials trade and development of innovative technologies in the nuclear sphere. Development of partner relationship between Russia and the USA will facilitate reduction of risk of nuclear weapons proliferation. More

13 May 2010 year

Ashot Sarkisov, Institute of problems of safe development of nuclear power industry (ISDNPI) of RAS, advisor of RAS:

 — In general the document made positive impression on me. I think that a new page is being opened in relations of our countries which, as it is written in the agreement, take leading positions in the area of development of nuclear technologies. More

13 May 2010 year

Anna Kupriyanova, senior analyst of administration of analytic researches of LLC «Uralsib Capital»

 — The company has very steady positions at international market, and in connection with increasing demand for nuclear fuel due to construction of nuclear power plants More

13 May 2010 year

Eugeny Shago, analyst of «Ingosstrakh investments»

 — The results can be estimated as not bad, growth of proceeds and profit is on hand, as well as that of net profitability which reached 15%, that is significantly better than that of foreign analogs. More

13 May 2010 year

Dmitry Baranov, leading expert of MC «Finam Management»

 — The showings achieved by JSC «TVEL» illustrate effectiveness of policy of Rosatom on development of nuclear power industry More

12 May 2010 year

Eugeny Fedorov, Chairman of Committee of the State Duma of RF on economic policy and entrepreneurship

 — I think that introduction of agreement with Russia in peaceful use of nuclear power, or 123 agreement, as it also called, to US Congress, is step showing serious intentions of US administration to approximation with Russia. More

12 May 2010 year

Alexander Ignatyuk, analyst of IG «Energocapital»

 — Even in case of absence of such agreement, our countries interacted in nuclear sphere, — first of all, it is supplies of low-enrichment uranium to the USA. More

12 May 2010 year

Andrey Zagorsky, leading scientific officer of Center of researches of peace and war problems under MSIIR, Cand. Sc. {History}

 — Speaking of «123 agreement», we mean clause of US Nuclear power industry Act. It determines rules of cooperation with foreign states More

12 May 2010 year

Andrey Gagarinsky, advisor of Director of Russian scientific center «Kurchatov Institute» on scientific development, Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences

 — I think that President Barack Obama returns this agreement to Congress in time. More

11 May 2010 year

Mikhail Margelov, chairman of committee of State Duma of RF on international affairs

 — And to some extent sober calculation returned the 123 agreement into political and economical turnover. Because this agreement is equally beneficial for Russia and USA, since it extends Russian and American cooperation in the nuclear sphere. More

11 May 2010 year

Andrey Klimov, deputy chairman of committee of State Duma of RF on international affairs

 — Ratification of the agreement will make it possible to extend considerably our cooperation in the nuclear sphere, that is, of course, profitable for both USA and Russia. More

11 May 2010 year

Konstantin Zaytsev, deputy chairman of committee for energy sector of State Duma of the RF

 — This agreement is beneficial to both parties. Russia and US cooperate in uranium supplies to American power companies in the framework of HEU-LEU project, under which Russian weapon-grade uranium is processed into fuel for American nuclear power plants More

06 May 2010 year

Dmitry Baranov, chief expert of MC «Finam Management»:

 — And I think that it will happen, because quality of of consruction of the first and second power units satisfied out Chinese partners. More

06 May 2010 year

Albert Vasilyev, deputy director of NIKIET, director of International center on ecologic safety:

 — And it is one more reason for that they signed framework agreement for construction of the second stage of this NPP with us, yet before signing of final acceptance statements of the first and second power units of Tyanvan NPP. More

06 May 2010 year

Ekaterina Tripoten, analyst of IC «Sovlink»

 — Undoubtedly, final acceptance of first two power units of Tyanvan NPP into operation is successful finishing of project in the framework of cooperation of Russia and China, as well as prior timely transfer of them in 2007. More

06 May 2010 year

Vladimir Zhidkih, chairman of Commission on youth affairs and tourism of Federation Council, member of commission of FC on natural monopolies

 — Tyanvan NPP became good example of mutually beneficial cooperation of Russia and China in nuclear power industry More

05 May 2010 year

Ivan Andrievsky, managing partner of NKG «2К Audit – Business consultations»

 — Tyanvan NPP is the largest object of economical cooperation between Russia and China More

05 May 2010 year

Eugeny Fedorov, chairman of committee of the State Duma of RF on economical policy and entrepreneurship

 — I would like to hope that our participation in development of Chinese nuclear power industry in the future will bring us serious advantages in entering Asian market, where such major international players work as Japan and South Korea, and it will strengthen our competitive positions». More

05 May 2010 year

Konstantin Zaytsev, deputy chairman of committee of the State Duma of RF on nuclear power industry

 — Tyanvan NPP is good proof of competitiveness of our nuclear power industry. More