Change the font size
Contacts:
Å-mail: news@rosatom.ru
30 May 2011 year
— The removal of the restrictions for Rosatom stands for the fact that in their times the Americans overreached themselves More
30 May 2011 year
— The restrictions could lead to the inefficiency of uranium supply to the USA existing and constructed NPPs More
30 May 2011 year
— The materials from Russian nuclear warheads provide 45% of the fuel for American nuclear reactors More
27 May 2011 year
— The Americans learned by their own experience that the restrictions for Rosatom are inconvenient More
27 May 2011 year
— The opportunity to establish a joint enterprise for construction of a nuclear fuel production plant on the USA territory is not excluded More
27 May 2011 year
— Diagnosis of malignant neoplasms at the earliest stages is its basic aim More
27 May 2011 year
— I suppose that Lithuania won’t change its position concerning Baltic NPP construction More
26 May 2011 year
— The confrontation between Lithuania and Russia in the construction of Baltic NPP is a strained one. More
26 May 2011 year
— On the background of common stagnation the receipt of work contracts is very essential for Baltic companies More
26 May 2011 year
— Baltic energy system can face significant energy deficit as early as in 2017–2018 More
25 May 2011 year
— I do not doubt the fact that the construction of Baltic NPP is profitable to both Russia and Lithuania More
25 May 2011 year
— The position of Lithuanian government concerning Baltic NPP is surprising More
24 May 2011 year
— Provided there are no more uncontrolled releases at Fukushima, we should see no further issues More
24 May 2011 year
The transaction between the Australian company and ARMZ is for the benefit of both the parties More
23 May 2011 year
— I believe, that expedition of the scientific vessel and all the are a good thing More
23 May 2011 year
— Russian experts could be correct More
23 May 2011 year
— Our atomists and IBRAE specialists must be paid tribute to More
20 May 2011 year
— The results of the expedition again confirmed that the population has no reason for panic. More
20 May 2011 year
— It is necessary to go on thinking out forms of public control over our NPPs operation More
20 May 2011 year
— There are no serious problems for the environment and not any scientific reasons for panic in the Far East either More
20 May 2011 year
— The Japanese treat their NPPs in a very special way More
20 May 2011 year
— I hope that the manifestation of WANO report in Russia will become a precedent More
18 May 2011 year
— There was nothing surprising and unexpected in further developments at the “Fukushima” NPP for us More
17 May 2011 year
— The influence of Fukushima-1 factor over the dynamics of the prices for uranium increase should not be exaggerated More
17 May 2011 year
— Deferred demand will become the main factor of the growth of the prices for uranium, among them on the part of Japan. More
17 May 2011 year
— There are still contradictions in information concerning Fukushima NPP More
13 May 2011 year
— The indexes on children’ leucosis around the nuclear cities are normal More
06 May 2011 year
— In the world there are few companies, involved in t commercialization of the technologies used in nuclear branch More
05 May 2011 year
— Synergetic effect from the science and business cooperation may turn out to be rather powerful More
05 May 2011 year
— Neither male nor female population understands atomic engineering well enough More
04 May 2011 year
— The number of the Russians, supporting the construction of new NPPs, exceeds the number of nuclear power opponents More
04 May 2011 year
— There is every reason to believe that the number of nuclear power adherents will increase More
04 May 2011 year
— It is important that all the states should accept the obligations on nuclear industry safe development More