Change the font size
Contacts:
Å-mail: news@rosatom.ru
30 June 2011 year
— Of course, from the point of view of ecologists, there are some points in the law we are worried about More
30 June 2011 year
— The creation of a distinct system of RAW management is the question of national safety. More
30 June 2011 year
— I consider the decision not to create new landfills for liquid radioactive wastes for underground injection to be half-faced More
29 June 2011 year
— If you don`t handle radioactive waste in a safe way, it becomes very dangerous More
29 June 2011 year
— Thus the most important ecological principle “Those who pollute must pay” is followed to. More
29 June 2011 year
— There are always those who is eager to make fuss on the topic of RAW, especially after Fukushima More
29 June 2011 year
— The third reading of the law of RAW will be held these days More
28 June 2011 year
— NPPs’ ecological nature is that the nuclear power industry does not give carbon dioxide emissions More
27 June 2011 year
— Our specialists work for IAEA being in different places of the world. More
27 June 2011 year
— National requirements should not be softer than those of IAEA. More
27 June 2011 year
— In the created system of NPPs’ safety we have to deal with probabilistic features More
27 June 2011 year
— For the last years no serious incidents has been registered in Russian nuclear power industry More
27 June 2011 year
— At present the most vivid interest to the nuclear generation is expressed by China and India More
24 June 2011 year
— In other words, Rosatom creates standard parameters of NPPs in fact More
24 June 2011 year
— The more stress-tests of NPPs are, the more inspections there will be — the better it is More
24 June 2011 year
— There must be definite requirements to NPPs’ operators, not general ones More
23 June 2011 year
— Living with the nuclear plants and following the principle “none of my business” is unlikely to be a success More
22 June 2011 year
— International control over safety of the NPPs existing in the world NPP is required More
17 June 2011 year
— We’re of the best opinion about this project More
16 June 2011 year
— It is in interest of Rosatom to show what they are doing to everybody. More
15 June 2011 year
— In many respects it is even more modern than the France’s EPR More
15 June 2011 year
— In fact, radiophobia mood is present in Europe More
15 June 2011 year
— On the whole, the opinion about the project of Baltic NPP is a good one. More
15 June 2011 year
— It would be economically reasonable for Lithuania to take part in the construction of Baltic NPP. More
15 June 2011 year
— On June 4, the public hearings on the project of Baltic NPP will be held in Tallinn. More
15 June 2011 year
— Those who construct a plant first will win the race. More
10 June 2011 year
— The Japanese should not worry, and so much is for us. More
10 June 2011 year
— Over the past 10 years Rosenergoatom Concern OJSC and Kola NPP have made a lot of investments into safety improvement. More
10 June 2011 year
— Power ascension of power unit No. 4 of Kola NPP will lead to the increase in commercial output. More
10 June 2011 year
— Public hearings have once again proved that Kola NPP and Rosenergoatom Concern OJSC are open for dialogue in all aspects and problems of nuclear power engineering. More
10 June 2011 year
— Today power augmentation of operating units is a world practice. More
10 June 2011 year
— The project of power ascension of Kola NPP fourth power unit is considered, balanced and modern. More
10 June 2011 year
— We are not the first and the ones who increase the capacity of power units. More
10 June 2011 year
— Today we face the problem of its further ascension More
10 June 2011 year
— Safety shall be justified at any power level. More
10 June 2011 year
— Due to the volume of the controlled raw materials uranium production in Kazakhstan we have become leaders More
10 June 2011 year
— We have decided to enlarge the reactors operation life More
10 June 2011 year
— We must explain that nuclear power is not dangerous More
10 June 2011 year
— I remind you that Fukushima reactors were 50 years old More
10 June 2011 year
— We keep on believing that the nuclear power industry is the key component of the power industry structure More
09 June 2011 year
— In our opinion this year the site on the nuclear topic has been improved More
09 June 2011 year
— The main proposal is to improve the safety and not to grudge money for it More
09 June 2011 year
— There are not so many alternative power sources, and they are not well studied. More
09 June 2011 year
— Nuclear fuel is the most ecological one, and there is no other way. More
09 June 2011 year
— New knowledge and new information – that is we participate in the forum for More
09 June 2011 year
— The Germany’s decision to decommission its NPPs was a populist one to a greater extent. More
09 June 2011 year
— The nuclear power industry should be more open than any sources of any other power branch More
09 June 2011 year
— We are very pleased by the event organization and we like it very much. More
09 June 2011 year
— It was very useful to visit the exhibition in Russia. More
09 June 2011 year
— France is not going to refuse from nuclear power use. More
09 June 2011 year
— We strongly believe that today’s international forum Atomexpo sponsored by Rosatom is a successful event. More
09 June 2011 year
— The most important things are taking place right at Atomexpo – at the sites like the present one a vivid communication of experts is going on More
08 June 2011 year
— From the point of view of isotope production we export up to 90% of the isotopes of the Russian Federation manufacture all over the world. More
08 June 2011 year
— Alongside with the power nuclear industry and weapons complex, radiation technologies must become “the third column” for the State Corporation. More
08 June 2011 year
— Most problems in medical institutions are solved by means of the extraction generator More
08 June 2011 year
— We have to make sure that the lesson is learned after the Fukushima accident More
08 June 2011 year
— Going the way of refusal from nuclear power industry development would slowdown development of all the world economy. More
08 June 2011 year
— Refusal of nuclear power now is likely to provoke financial problems in the future More
08 June 2011 year
— The list of participants fully reflects the industry More
08 June 2011 year
— I do not exclude that Germany’s decision on NPPs would be reconsidered More
08 June 2011 year
— The accident at Fukushima won’t influence the nuclear power branch development in the countries, where the development was planned in a serious way. More
08 June 2011 year
— Nuclear power is an important part of power supply More
08 June 2011 year
— We won’t refuse from our plans for the nuclear power branch More
07 June 2011 year
— Rosatom will allocate a number of its plants abroad More
07 June 2011 year
— Rosatom and AREVA have a number of cooperative projects. In particular, they are closed cycle reactors More
07 June 2011 year
— The project of Baltic NPP has the highest characteristics for provision of power supply reliability More
07 June 2011 year
— Future of the nuclear industry on the territory of Germany has not been completely defined More
07 June 2011 year
— We present “Radiation Technologies” program (Rosatom subdivision) More
07 June 2011 year
— Gas turbine plant is the only alternative for Germany More
07 June 2011 year
— At Atomexpo there is a great remarkable exhibition, which proves that the nuclear power branch in Russia is well-developed More
07 June 2011 year
— Nuclear Renaissance has not passed away, it is getting more concrete More
07 June 2011 year
— Accidents happen in every industry More
06 June 2011 year
— Germany now will have to build more coal plants and buy more gas from Russia More
06 June 2011 year
— The Russian nuclear market is one of the most important More
06 June 2011 year
— In comparison with the previous year, this «Atomexpo» is much better because of considerable quantity of exhibitors More
06 June 2011 year
— The decision of Germany to refuse nuclear power is not circumspect More
06 June 2011 year
— Germany is a classic example of environmental activism gone overboard More
06 June 2011 year
— We plan to find out the prospects and tendencies of development of the nuclear industry in Russia and in the world at the forum. More
06 June 2011 year
— Industry and regular conferences and symposiums are necessary for such large industry as nuclear power engineering. More
06 June 2011 year
— On the other hand, to my mind, there are no alternatives to nuclear-power engineering today. More
06 June 2011 year
— Nuclear industry has today several challenges but also a lot of opportunities More
03 June 2011 year
— We do not wait for a global rejection of nuclear-power engineering after the «Fukushima» accident More
03 June 2011 year
— Atomexpo will become a site for highly professional discussion, the more that all the prime of the world nuclear industry will be present at the Forum More
03 June 2011 year
— The advantage of Atomexpo Forum is the opportunity to see and estimate the new industrial branches within the framework of the exhibition. More
02 June 2011 year
— Atomexpo Forum is the largest event of the kind in Russia, where all Rosatom enterprises and organizations will be presented More
02 June 2011 year
— Nuclear energy has played a significant role in the fight against the climatic change More
02 June 2011 year
— I am confident that the German decision will make all other countries to somehow make a common front pro-nuclear More
02 June 2011 year
— The Atomexpo Forum is a good opportunity to enhance knowledge on nuclear industry More
01 June 2011 year
— The situation in the Belarus economy will have a small impact on the Russian desire to participate in the NPP building More
01 June 2011 year
— The requirement of Belarus for the electric power will be always growing More
01 June 2011 year
— Most countries will include the lessons learned in their nuclear policy More